Talk:Pope John Paul II (miniseries)

Suspicious edits

User:206.172.50.131 edits are "souspicious" --Melaen 21:19, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Pope John Paul II DVD2.jpg

Image:Pope John Paul II DVD2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:18, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:CaryElwes asKarol Wojtyla.jpg

Image:CaryElwes asKarol Wojtyla.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:57, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Jon Voight JPIImovie.jpg

Image:Jon Voight JPIImovie.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 22:42, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Requested move

Done; uncontroversial. If you create an account and become autoconfirmed (make ten edits and wait four days), you can perform such actions yourself.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 18:21, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Plot deletion

Why was the Plot section deleted from this entry and will it ever be back with the exact accurate information it used to have before it was pulled ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Examplar (talk • contribs)

I removed the plot section because it was a WP:POVFORK of the Pope's actual biography. This article is in dire need of references before it needs anything else. The references should describe the miniseries itself, not just the Pope's life. For instance, what part of the Pope's life was portrayed in a way that was criticized by a prominent reviewer? What part of the performance was especially praised? Who received high marks for acting? Binksternet (talk) 03:46, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Pope John Paul II (miniseries). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051208200703/http://www.cbs.com/specials/pope/ to http://www.cbs.com/specials/pope
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061017100422/http://www.ignatius.com/Videos/PopeJohnPaulII/multimedia.html to http://www.ignatius.com/Videos/PopeJohnPaulII/multimedia.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:08, 5 December 2017 (UTC)