Talk:Pop! The First 20 Hits

Fair use rationale for Image:Erasurepop.jpg

Image:Erasurepop.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:20, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Merge proposal (Pop! The First 20 Hits and Total Pop! The First 40 Hits)

It seems to me that since the "Total Pop!" compilation is essentially just an expanded and updated version of the original "Pop!" compilation, it would make more sense to keep them together (and show them in context).

I'm not overly bothered which title becomes the "main" one and which is redirected. Note that we can still have separate category entries for each (since redirects can be categorised), so that's not a problem.

Ubcule (talk) 19:01, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Okay, answering almost a year later, but I don't think it's a big deal to merge them. I'd put the Total Pop 40 as the "main" article as the track list is more than doubled and it is the more recent release. In addition — there is no article for it, but if a merge does occur I would suggest a redirect at Pop2! The Second 20 Hits to wherever the article ends up. Would also include the album artwork for all releases (Total Pop 40 was released in an expanded box set too) as well as charts tables, etc. - eo (talk) 13:41, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Pop! The First 20 Hits. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5aWxoHiRP?url=http://www.riaa.com/goldandplatinumdata.php?table=SEARCH_RESULTS to http://www.riaa.com/goldandplatinumdata.php?table=SEARCH_RESULTS

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:18, 24 May 2017 (UTC)