Talk:Pitt Meadows

Fair use rationale for Image:Pitt Meadows BC blazon.jpg

Image:Pitt Meadows BC blazon.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 00:51, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Pitt Meadows BC flag.jpg

Image:Pitt Meadows BC flag.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 00:52, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Pitt Meadows BC herald.jpg

Image:Pitt Meadows BC herald.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 00:53, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Proposal to rename page

The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was move.

Proposed rename: Pitt Meadows, British Columbia → Pitt Meadows Pitt Meadows currently redirects to Pitt Meadows, British Columbia. There is no Pitt Meadows (disambiguation) page; other uses of Pitt Meadows in page names are either secondary to the community or used in composite names. As the place name is evidently unique and primary, it is proposed to simplify the page name per WP:CANSTYLE and WP:PRIMARYUSAGE. Dl2000 (talk) 03:08, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

• Support per nom. - DigitalC (talk) 07:27, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
• Support; an internet search suggests that, despite restricting a query to non-BC occurrences of "Pitt Meadows", results are still strongly associated with this city. Mindmatrix 14:30, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Statistical data

To answer the question posed here: "Why are we reverting the most up to date census data - IP's data is correct." you have to look at the anon's edit history where the anon replaced data 1) without explanation and 2) in many cases changed 2011 statistics with data from an unknown location. After a half dozen reviews and reverts I just started reverting all. I'm sorry if the anon got one or two right and I reverted. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:55, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

lots of useful historical detail here

See 30 years of Pitt elections, Leslie Norman, Maple Ridge News, November 6 2014.Skookum1 (talk) 07:36, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Bridge name corrected

The bridge image is of the Pitt River Bridge, not the Golden Ears. Correction made. 68.146.52.234 (talk) 14:53, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Pitt Meadows Cenotaph.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:25, 16 August 2022 (UTC)