This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
This article is part of WikiProject Miami, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the Miami metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.MiamiWikipedia:WikiProject MiamiTemplate:WikiProject MiamiMiami articles
Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Unless there is some material that is independent of Parrot Jungle (such as pictures showing the current state of the park, the entrance/entrance sign, and so forth), I cannot see why this cannot be merged into redirected to Parrot Jungle Island. This needs much more to establish its own identity, and I don't see it here, starting with getting more about the present than is already mentioned about the park's past (for example, is the second picture necessary? It would be better to show something like the current landscaping or something that wasn't there in the Parrot Jungle and Gardens days). B.Wind19:41, 22 November 2006 (UTC)Reply
The next time I go there I'll take some updated photos. Those are the only ones I have (from the old park). When I take the new ones I'll replace whats there. The old ones should be better than nothing at all, for now. - Marc Averette20:16, 22 November 2006 (UTC)Reply