Talk:Physiology of decompression
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Decompression theory was copied or moved into Physiology of decompression with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
B-Class review
edit
B |
Comprehensively cited. Not fully comprehensive, but fairly extensive. Complies. Complies. Not an easy subject to illustrate, but there are some images. Looks OK. |
Good for me. Promoted to B class. • • • Peter (Southwood) (talk): 18:55, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned references in Physiology of decompression
editI check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Physiology of decompression's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "Perdix":
- From Diver navigation: Perdix Operating Instruction Manual Revision A (PDF). Richmond, British Columbia: Shearwater Research.
- From Oxygen toxicity: Shearwater Research (15 January 2020). Perdix Operating Manual (PDF). DOC. 13007-SI-RevD (2020-01-15). Retrieved 16 July 2020.
{{cite book}}
:|website=
ignored (help)
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 12:56, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Split out Decompression stress and risk factors
editI am thinking of splitting out the material on Decompression stress and risk factors, mainly for size reasons, as that seems the component most suitable for separate discussion. Opinions are welcome, particularly if supported by logical reasons. At this stage there is no urgency. Cheers, · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 10:38, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
occupational health and safety
editoutline types of OSH documents 2C0F:FE38:232C:D97:1:0:3A7E:BA76 (talk) 12:18, 30 July 2024 (UTC)