Talk:Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin

GAN result

This article was nominated for good article status on 26 January 2011. I've declined this nomination on the grounds that it fails the following criteria: 2) (b), (c). AGK [•] 13:10, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 11:08, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

I will review. Pyrotec (talk) 11:08, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Initial comments

This review of mine has somewhat slipped. I was aware that the main editor was not available, and I used that as a reason to doing other tasks. I'm now going document my findings so far on this nomination. Pyrotec (talk) 16:07, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

In this part of the review I'm going to go through the article section by section, but leaving the WP:Lead until after the last section. I will be mostly highlighting "problems", but I may fix minor ones as a go, so they may not be listed here. If I don't comment much on a particular section , that indicates that it is OK. Pyrotec (talk) 16:11, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

• Background -

• Note 1, which gives a direct quotation from Section 1(b) of the Natural Gas Act really needs a link/citation back to the original text of the Act.

• Proceedings below -

• I find the title "strange": (1) it seems unfinished; (2) is "below" necessary? The next section is titled Supreme Court, so perhaps "below" is an American term for court proceedings below that of the Supreme Court - I'm not a US citizen, so I'm not familiar with this terminology.
• The first paragraph is well referenced, but it seems to be "floating" out of time:

• No date of creation for the FPC - perhaps this is not too important.
• In the final paragraph a date is given for the start of the investigation - the first mention is given here, but as it is date later on I'll let this one go.
• Olds' failure to be re-elected is mentioned in some detail, but again there is no date for this, i.e. when did he get push off?

...stopping for now. To be continued. Pyrotec (talk) 16:47, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110715144815/http://c0403731.cdn.cloudfiles.rackspacecloud.com/collection/papers/1960/1960_1221_Landis_report.pdf to http://c0403731.cdn.cloudfiles.rackspacecloud.com/collection/papers/1960/1960_1221_Landis_report.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:15, 25 June 2017 (UTC)