| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
.JPG)
Own article
editIs this going to become its own article soon? AlphaZetta (talk) 08:51, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
Bias
editIMO the article goes into excessive detail when it is talking about his "controversies". I pay pretty close attention to the news and I haven't seen anything about these. I don't think they are significant enough to take up so much of the article. Definitely imbalanced. 119.224.38.234 (talk) 11:02, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- I agree, the Political life section needs major expansion to add balance. David Palmer//cloventt (talk) 17:42, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- I've made some effort to improve the neutrality. I'd appreciate comments and consensus-making on whether it is now at an acceptable standard to remove the WP:NPOV warning from the page. David Palmer//cloventt (talk) 20:25, 1 September 2024 (UTC)