Talk:Peter Pan & Wendy

Latest comment: 25 days ago by Haroldwinstanley in topic Should there be an update to the Reviews section

November 29, 2020

edit

This title should be named only Peter Pan. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 181.222.83.87 (talk) 21:23, 29 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

This is not a forum for discussion on dislikes of movie titles; it's about article improvement. Georgia guy (talk) 21:52, 29 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Announcement of commencement of production on "Peter Pan and Wendy" with a fully revealed cast and an announcement of a release on Disney+ in 2022

edit

Disney just put out a press release that gives an announcement of commencement of production on "Peter Pan and Wendy" with a fully revealed cast, including new cast members like Alan Tudyk, and an announcement of a release on Disney+ in 2022: https://twitter.com/ThePlaylist/status/1371828149273640960.

Hoping we can add all this information into the film's wiki page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MarvelDisney20 (talkcontribs) 19:02, 16 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Line in casting re New Zealand

edit

Is that relevant any longer? If they've cast Molony and he's from the UK as per his article then it didn't come to anything. As it reads now it could be read as him being from New Zealand.219.88.68.195 (talk) 22:41, 21 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Error in edit note

edit

At 20:53 today I edited the first section and noted “(There is only one title role.)”

This is an error, but I’m letting the minor edit stand because the version I left is not wrong (the error occurs in my edit note only) and, IMO, is marginally clearer.

Nat (talk) 20:06, 30 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Reception

edit

I know there no source of the reception, but I've heard that despite received positive reviews from critics, I heard it got divided by audiences, and fans, apparently. Stephenfisher2001 (talk) 12:04, 29 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

i also heard that it gpt very poor audience rewievs rating. 95.168.121.34 (talk) 05:11, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Of course this'll be adjusted, once the premiere run ends, like with all Disney and Marvel movies.
The pages are kept positive during the first weeks, and any negative reviews are closely curated.
If movie has bad initial reception it's said to be review-bombed.
It's really sad. 37.248.165.136 (talk) 11:29, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
I mean, it's really not a secret. You can always go to Rotten Tomatoes and IMDb and see the audience scores. We don't add them here (unless it's in significant third party sources) because of review bombing, so you really don't know if it's accurate. WP:FILMAUDIENCE However, be rest assured the reviews and scores are still on their respective sites, even if it is not listed on Wikipedia. :) Mike Allen 14:33, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Should we include YouTubers like The Critical Drinker? He's got a review of this movie and many others. UltimateFantasyY (talk) 19:44, 9 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
The link? UltimateFantasyY (talk) 16:30, 23 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
there's a good video on Youtube by Disparu highlighting the hypocrisy of the (asinine) concept of "review-bombing" pertaining to this movie. btw, how come there's no box office results here? that was what I wanted to look up here...

Dubbed

edit

It is clear that the actors are not speaking English as the dialogue does not fit the mouth actions, what was the original language? ArbyWill (talk) 17:17, 29 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

No, we spoke English in the movie so don't worry! It could be an editing issue which makes it look dubbed, or you have bad connection and there's lagback! Haroldwinstanley (talk) 23:46, 4 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

And yet again another entry that is locked.

edit

I wonder why. Guess Wikipedia is now only edited by the " chosen elite". Oh wait it was like this for years now. NVM. 189.128.22.186 (talk) 06:37, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nope, because anon users kept adding their own reviews into the article. Please make an edit request if you need assistance. Thank you! Mike Allen 15:04, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Anon is doing that? It's great to see an editor making accusations of bias, when their very on accusations are biased themselves.:) 2600:8805:A985:4300:42:8A50:9BA:9479 (talk) 01:06, 5 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
It's literally in the page's history. Mike Allen 02:22, 5 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
So nobody is mentioning that the Rotten Tomatoes audience has given it a review of only 13 percent, making it one of the lowest Disney live action films ever? This is purely information, but no, let's not offend anyone with facts, right? Lock up the article. *Shrug* — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:11:230:3070:60CB:CC21:9B99:7A52 (talk) 01:21, 12 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

"Alyssa Wapanatah" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  The redirect Alyssa Wapanatah has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 13 § Alyssa Wapanatah until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 21:37, 13 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

"Peter Pan & Wendy (upcoming film)" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  The redirect Peter Pan & Wendy (upcoming film) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 13 § Peter Pan & Wendy (upcoming film) until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 21:42, 13 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

"Peter Pan & Wendy (2022 film)" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  The redirect Peter Pan & Wendy (2022 film) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 13 § Peter Pan & Wendy (2022 film) until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 21:45, 13 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Should there be an update to the Reviews section

edit

Peter Pan and Windy currently has 27k fan reviews. IMDb uses a weighted ratings on movies they deemed were “review bombed”. The audience score is still only a 4.4. That’s not generally favorable.


https://www.imdb.com/title/tt5635026/ WhowinsIwins (talk) 02:44, 12 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

It's talking about critics, not the audience. The critics did give it 'generally favourable' reviews, and obviously the IMDb rating is predominantly from the audience. (Also, it's spelt WEndy) Haroldwinstanley (talk) 23:48, 4 December 2024 (UTC)Reply