Talk:Pete Luckett
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Untitled
editThis looks like a bio of my nobody neighbor next-door, or even worse, of me! C'mon folks, let's tell people right away why this person merits an article. Reading on, I do get it, but my first thought was deletion. I've never heard of this guy--whoever knows him needs to fix this up.
Looks to me like the most important thing about him is that he hosts a TV show, and that should lead. But what do I know? Unschool 00:23, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
I randomly came across his show on the Food Network, The Food Hunter, and now watch it religously, even though it comes on at 3:30am where I live. This guy is incredibly charismatic and knows his produce. I say he's definitely worth a wikipedia bio. You should check out his show.
English question
edit"Nova Scotia's then antiqued Sunday shopping laws" - is that correct Canadian English? In British English one would have to use "antiquated" there, but as I'm not Canadian I won't edit it. 86.135.7.222 (talk) 14:48, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
no it's not correct Cdn English - we'd say antiquated too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.162.134.218 (talk) 22:05, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Pete Luckett. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041229163914/http://www.petesfrootique.com/ to http://www.petesfrootique.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:44, 30 November 2017 (UTC)