Talk:Persian Constitutional Revolution

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Dscotty26 in topic Unsourced information

"detrimental"

edit

"People like Sattar Khan and Bagher Khan and cities like Tabriz played detrimental roles in this movement"

I'm not sure what is meant by 'detrimental' here. Anyway, isn't this word rather POV? By detrimental does the author mean they succeeded or failed in advancing the cause of the movement - we can only interpret this if we know the author's point of view. I've substituted the word 'significant' which is more neutral.

- Your change improved it but the sentence still doesn't really make sense. Significant how? People can play a role in a movement but not at the same level as cities.

The aftermath / effects

edit

The section on the aftermath of the revolution and its eventual effects was removed. While grossly incomplete I believe that this is a critical section that allows future historical events to be put into context given a very important event. Tototom 07:49, 29 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

The Constitutionalists story?

edit

So little is so far being said about the Constitutionalists themselves, the people and their story, the origin of their activism. And, suddenly in the article we discover that, they were actually militant! Indeed, it is quite interesting to see that a group of reformers and constitutionalists were at the same time militant, and successfully - also the details of this arrangement need be told here. Just thought to give those hints since I cannot add anything myself. Thanks, __Maysara 08:07, 3 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Copyvio

edit

The article contained a lot of material copied from http://www.iranchamber.com/history/constitutional_revolution/constitutional_revolution.php which I just removed, reverting to the latest version that did not include copies of text from that website. roozbeh 12:27, 1 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Rewrite

edit

I've started rewriting the article to take care of copyvio issues without losing the information. can we maybe hold of on the reverting for a while? Thanks L0b0t 16:22, 1 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

A rewrite that keeps the copyright-violating parts does not make the resulting article clean. It will make it a copy of a copy, which will still be a copy. For having a clean article, I suggest rethinking the whole structure of presenting the material. Use various sources, arrive at a conclusion, and then write those. Use original prose, your own words, instead of minor changes made to another's. roozbeh 15:56, 2 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
UNBELIVABLE!!! Roozbeh, why do you have to be so unhelpful. As opposed to just trashing the article you could have made the effort to copy out the sections that were okay - now all that work needs to be re-done. The article was going to be re-written, but obviously that wasn't good enough for you. Sometimes I wonder why the fuck i bother with wikipedia when there are ***** like you around. Tototom 22:01, 2 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
Actually you know what... screw wikipedia. you can delete my account if you want. at least i wont be wasting my free time anymore.

Tags

edit

Article needs a lot of work. For one thing the revolution ran from 1905 to 1911 but there is no information about what happened after 1906. Sentences like "The revolution created new opportunities and opened up seemingly boundless possibilities for Persia’s future. Many different groups fought to shape the course of the Revolution, and all sections of society were ultimately to be in some way changed by it." seem like filler. --BoogaLouie (talk) 19:23, 2 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Name should be changed to "Persian Constitutional Revolution"

edit

In 1906 the international name of Iran was Persia and also this event was recorded in English-language materals as "Persian Constitutional Revolution", not "Iranian...". Most of English-language books and articles about this revolution also natually called that "Persian Cons..." thanks.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shayan7 (talkcontribs) 15:48, 27 November 2009 (UTC) --Shayan7 15:51, 27 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

The name of this article should be changed to "Iran's Constitutional Revolution"

edit

Take a look at "Farman-e-mashrute" the order of constitutional revolution. The king of Qajar (King of Iran on that time)signed it as "Mamaleke mahruseye iran" (United states of Iran). Thus the name of this article must be corrected under actual translations. /Thanks alot

Admittedly, I don't know a lot about the subject, but when I see a topic's name spontaneously get changed AFTER YEARS OF BEING SETTLED AS "PERSIAN", my spidey-senses tingle. Perhaps there's some nationalistic POV being inseted here. According to another article the name Iran became more widely used (official?) in 1935. This article describes a period before that. --Cpflieger (talk) 17:38, 27 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Requested move

edit
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was page moved.  Skomorokh  08:41, 27 December 2009 (UTC)Reply


Iranian Constitutional RevolutionPersian Constitutional Revolution — On that time the name of the country was Persia in English (internationally) and this revolution was also recorded as "Persian Constitutional Revolution" in the west. --Shayan7 16:03, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Russian intervention during the Constitutional Revolution

edit

there were Russian military interventions in 1909 and 1911 during the turmoil, as discussed in the Russian wikipedia article http://ru.wiki.x.io/wiki/%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D0%B9%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%82%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B2%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%B2_%D0%9F%D0%B5%D1%80%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8E 22:35, 27 October 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.119.30.87 (talk)

The Persian Revolution of 1905-1909

edit

http://books.google.com/books?id=ugg4AAAAIAAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false

Rajmaan (talk) 19:07, 27 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Persian Constitutional Revolution. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:50, 30 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 16 December 2018

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved as a technical request. The previous title was established by an RM. Any move away from that title should attain consensus first. (non-admin closure) RGloucester 17:34, 16 December 2018 (UTC)Reply


Iranian Constitutional RevolutionPersian Constitutional Revolution – This page was moved with discussion or consensus and Iran was still referred to as "Persia" back then. Charles Essie (talk) 02:14, 16 December 2018 (UTC)Reply


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Unsourced information

edit

While looking through this article almost every single key point is unsourced and unverified if not changed it will need to be removed. First two sections need expanded sources many of the source links do not even work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dscotty26 (talkcontribs) 19:23, 12 April 2020 (UTC)Reply