Talk:Peggy Shippen

Death date

The death date at the top of the page(stating when she was born and when she died) is different from what later in the article says. Please get this changed. (I have no idea what the actual death date was!) Alyssa Jane (talk) 23:09, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Novel

Hey everyone. I am writing a history novel about Peggy Shippen. If anyone has any other webpages that I can use for information, please tell me the site address. Thanks! NovelWriter2598 (talk) 15:08, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Biased

This article is not NPOV.(213.10.46.8 (talk) 22:04, 31 October 2009 (UTC))

Rewriting

I'm going to rewrite this and I'd appreciate some help.

Many errors in this -- anyone want to discuss?

I am co-author of an upcoming biography of Peggy Shippen. There are many factual errors here, in my view, but rather than simply correcting them, I would prefer to discuss them with the authors of this entry. For starters, Peggy was born June 11, not July 11. And the Lawrence portrait of her with her child shows her firstborn son Edward, not her daughter Sophia. (Young boys often wore their hair long back then.) Also, Peggy had three sisters, not two. Lots of other things, too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Markejacob (talk • contribs) 03:29, 16 January 2012‎ (UTC)

Regarding the portrait: the caption identifying it as her daughter is based on the source, ExplorePAHistory.com.[1] —C.Fred (talk) 03:34, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Peggy Shippen/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Oh my goodness this was the bestest article ever...I really loved it. It was the perfect size, and told everything that you need to know!!! By the end of this article I was like totally "in the know" about Peggy Shippen. It was really good. So yea less i mean more of these articles would be so much better. kthanks Mia

Last edited at 23:19, 5 December 2006 (UTC). Substituted at 02:34, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Peggy Shippen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060519012550/http://www.si.umich.edu/spies/people.html to http://www.si.umich.edu/spies/people.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:05, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Description as 'the highest-paid spy in the American Revolution'

First, describing her as a 'spy' seems rhetorical and dubious, since all she definitely did was handle her husband's conspiratorial correspondence, which makes her at most a plotter, not a spy; the text also says that 'some historians believe' that she sent military secrets before her marriage, but 'some ... believ[ing]' is not enough for a categorical description in the lede. Second, saying that she was 'a paid spy' seems even more inaccurate, since she only got an award from the British Crown after the events. She wasn't being paid while she was conspiring and she had no way of knowing whether and how she would be rewarded by the British. By this logic, a researcher or writer who got a Nobel prize could be said to have been a 'paid researcher/writer' of the Nobel committee. Everything indicates that her beliefs were loyalist to begin with and that she wasn't motivated by payment. One source may have called her that; I'd say that's a sensationalist, inaccurate and biased description which hardly belongs in the lede. 62.73.69.121 (talk) 09:28, 25 May 2024 (UTC)