This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Paul Ritter (architect) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Urban studies and planning, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Urban studies and planning on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Urban studies and planningWikipedia:WikiProject Urban studies and planningTemplate:WikiProject Urban studies and planningUrban studies and planning articles
Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I came across the following fragmented quote in the article: '‘the sixty six year golden era of WE Bold and than Mc I Green” the Town Clerks In editing this, as seemed necessary, I took the abnormal liberty of dispensing with the quotation marks in order to justify fixing the typographic errors to make it read "the sixty-six-year golden era of [town clerks] W. E. Bold and W. A. McInnes Green which ended in 1965." Part of my reason for doing this was that William Ernest Bold (1873-1953) and William Allan McInnes Green (1896-1972) are the subjects of biographical articles here and here, and both obviously notable candidates for inclusion in Wikipedia. Naming them properly is a first step to creating those new articles. Cheers, Bjenks (talk) 08:08, 16 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
Both W. E. Bold and Allan Green (after whom the Conservatory is named) merit articles. They both received ample secondary coverage in newspapers of the day. Orderinchaos04:10, 19 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 3 years ago14 comments11 people in discussion
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Addendum: I'm convinced by Black Kite's analysis below that the actor is the primary topic, so I would support moving that page to the base title. There's only fifteen inbound links here from the article namespace so those should be easy to fix. Mackensen(talk)18:16, 10 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
Support per nom. Neutral about the 2nd move (on whether there's no primary or whether the actor is primary), but the dab page would be good as primary topic swaps are often messy. Nonetheless, the architect certainly isn't the primary topic. Paintspot Infez (talk) 00:41, 10 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
Support first and Move Paul Ritter (actor) to the base page. I assumed that the spike in viewing figures was related to his death, but even if you go back five years, the actor has many times the page views of all the other Paul Ritter pages put together.
Even if you go back to, say, 2016-2018, before Ritter was in the series that brought him extra fame, his article still outstrips the others by around 14-to-1. He is clearly the primary target. Black Kite (talk)11:26, 10 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.