Talk:Pasifika Festival

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Auckland Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Auckland, which aims to improve the coverage of Auckland, New Zealand, on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.AucklandWikipedia:WikiProject AucklandTemplate:WikiProject AucklandWikiProject Auckland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Festivals Low‑importance

	Holidays portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Festivals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Festivals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FestivalsWikipedia:WikiProject FestivalsTemplate:WikiProject FestivalsFestivals articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Untitled

Latest comment: 15 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

I have a video of Pasifika 2009. First-hand, original content. Propose addition of the following external link:

Pasifika Festival 2009 - A short Faber Optimé YouTube film.

Faber Optimé (talk) 07:40, 8 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Oppose. I have invited the author to take this to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spam.-gadfium 07:51, 8 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hey Gadfium,

I posted this in direct response to your specific suggestion. Thanks for nothing and thanks for wasting my time. NOT.
Please review spam guideline. It would be appreciated if in future you actually review materials in question prior to erroneously and scurrilously blanket labelling contributions as "spam". Being an editor is more than just a label pal - it actually implies you'll exercise some effort and qualitative judgement - glaring omissions in this instance.
I invite you to ACTUALLY LOOK AT WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT PRIOR TO MAKING AN OFFENSIVE CONTRIBUTION. Were you to actually look at the reference you'd find a page with a great deal more quality information than is presented in this one. You attitude discourages my expending effort trying to improve Wikipedia when folk such as yourself seem to have nothing better than frustrate good intentions.
Stick to the facts mate and leave your dogma at the door. Your lack of good faith nor any welcome to your approach wholly flies in the face of stated Wikipedia guidelines. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Faber Optimé (talk • contribs) 16:18, 8 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

As has been explained to you by several people at User talk:Faber Optimé, you should not be linking to your own work, and all those who have reviewed your videos to date appear to have agreed that they are not suitable as links.-gadfium 20:24, 8 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Add topic