This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Parapsychology, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.ParapsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject ParapsychologyTemplate:WikiProject ParapsychologyParapsychology articles
This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.ParanormalWikipedia:WikiProject ParanormalTemplate:WikiProject Paranormalparanormal articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occult, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the occult on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OccultWikipedia:WikiProject OccultTemplate:WikiProject OccultOccult articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative viewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative viewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative viewsAlternative views articles
Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
I am working on improving this page and would be interested in any sources the community would find relevant to the topic. Primarily, I would like to add more information about the scientists and writers involved with SRI. For example, Ray Hyman is not mentioned in this article at all. Hyman is probably best known by the public at large for his work in the case of Uri Geller alongside such names as James Randi and Paul Kurtz, and he has written extensively on the methodologies employed by parapsychology researchers, including those at SRI. I am also interested in adding some specifics of the methodology of the research, preferably those contained in specific journal articles or papers published by the scientists associated with SRI. VaDawn (talk) 20:49, 5 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
I've added a ref to Ray Hyman's 1986 paper, which responded to Jahn's supporting review, and puts the entire field in a historical context. It's well worth reading, if you have access. jxm (talk) 00:59, 9 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The current section ordering is confusing. For example, it seems like Replication and Controversy could be merged and moved closer to the RV material. Perhaps a better arrangement would be to group the various experimental material first, and then chronologically describe the publication history and associated controversies. If there are no objections, I'll tackle that shortly. Thoughts? jxm (talk) 21:25, 9 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
.png){kind=small}
