This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Ghemawat is cited as a counter-voice to Thomas Friedman, which is certainly true. However, does Friedman really count as an "intellectual?" This is not an aspersion against Mr. Friedman, I simply think in this case Mr. Friedman doesn't really characterize himself as an "intellectual." He is a columnist and author. Can we change his descriptor to "author?" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jrhoadley (talk • contribs) 15:33, 27 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
