This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oklahoma, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oklahoma on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OklahomaWikipedia:WikiProject OklahomaTemplate:WikiProject OklahomaOklahoma articles
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
It has been proposed to delete this article for lack of notability. I have added an explicit statement to the introductory section describing at least two reasons that I find the subject notable. I am proposing that the article be retained.
In general, appellate judges often do not seem notable because of the nature of their work, especially at levels below the U.S. Supreme Court. First, the outcomes very often do not impact the welfare of very large numbers of the American public, hence do not attract the interest of the public or the reporting press. Second, the impact of a single judge on a group decision is usually hard to determine. How is one judge to be more notable than another? Obviously, some have become notable for committing some crime. But, what kinds of positive acts make one notable? In the Helmerich & Payne case, I consider that Judge Thornbrugh is notable because he dug deeply enough into the case to find a fact that ultimately determined the outcome of a case and righted a wrong (supposedly the objective of every appellate court). In addition, he was fortunate in that the press picked up the story and publicized it. How many such incidents may have gone unreported?
