Teodoreanu as a propagandist

edit
  • Teodoreanu took employment as an Antonescu regime propagandist, publishing, in the newspaper Universul, a panegyric dedicated to pilot Horia Agarici.[72]

The cited source doesn't appear to substantiate Teodoreanu as "having taken employment as an Antonescu regime propagandist". Please find a proper citation or rephrase, thanks, see WP:CS — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.2.61.54 (talk) 15:04, 20 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

The entire article is about propaganda (using an even harsher term: "manipulation"); Păstorel is sampled by the author for his contribution. The objection is bogus. Dahn (talk) 19:45, 4 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Teodoreanu as "being driven into an ambiguous relationship with the Securitate secret police"

edit
  • He avoided a direct answer, but eventually informed Securitate about Maria Tănase's apparent disloyalty.[58]

The cited source reveals Teodoreanu reporting about Maria Tanase being dissatisfied with her salary: there are therefore no traces of M.T. being depicted as disloyal by Teodoreanu. Please, rephrase accordingly, thank you, see WP:CS — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.2.61.54 (talk) 15:23, 20 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

This refers to her disloyalty toward the regime, so I don't really see what the objection is. The sources specifically quotes Teodoreanu's denunciation, and it is clearly not just about the salary: Discuţii cu caracter politic n-am purtat. Insă, din unele manifestări ale ei şi din unele expresii, respectiv prin faptul că işi manifesta nemulţumirea faţă de salariul care-l avea, era nemulţumită de căntecele care i se cereau să le interpreteze: «aştia imi cer să cănt cutare căntec», mi-am dat seama că nu este ataşată regimului democrat-popular. The editorial voice in the article specifically refers to his being an informant and to his activity as a "betrayal". This objection is also bogus. Dahn (talk) 19:49, 4 July 2022 (UTC)Reply