Talk:Ordinary and extraordinary care

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Ethics

Who the hell wrote this? Ordinary and extraordinary care are legal ideas relating to torts and negligence... what on earth does it have to do with biothetics and Catholicism? Strike this page! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.120.255.139 (talk) 04:03, 10 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

New citations, more work needed

Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion

Greetings Wikipedians! I have endeavored to improve the article by adding a section about secular views and a citation from a secular source. But the comment (above about torts and negligence) makes a good point. That is not my area of expertise but I will try to make a start on the legal aspect. One might ask why I bother to do this. I wonder myself sometimes, and after some groping, I believe I've arrived at an answer: it's interesting, I enjoy the research and writing process...and I don't have anything else to do. Cordially, BuzzWeiser196 (talk) 17:42, 10 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Looks like the simplest fix is to add a hatnote directing the reader to other meanings, including tort law. This I have done with today's edits. BuzzWeiser196 (talk) 11:24, 11 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Today's "wordsmithing" edit is mine; I forgot to log in. BuzzWeiser196 (talk) 12:13, 11 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic