Talk:Operation Dominic

Arkansas Test Picture

The photo for the Arkansas test has in its' caption "Notice the aircraft on fire" - Most likely, that is not a fire - that is smoke from the cartridge start that was used to start the B-57 Canberra shown in the picture. Joeylawn (talk) 01:31, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Reorganization

With the existence of a good "Operation Fishbowl" page, I'll be deleting them from the list on Dominic with a link to that page for those shots, in the next couple of weeks. There's a lot more text on them over there. SkoreKeep (talk) 07:02, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Came up faster than I expected. Fishbowl is separate topic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SkoreKeep (talk • contribs) 07:03, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

The table on this page is generated by database

The table on this page and the contents of any nuclear tests infobox are generated from a database of nuclear testing which I have maintained and researched for a number of years. The table is automatically generated from that database by a Visual Basic script, and then has, periodically, been inserted into the page manually. I began doing this in October of 2013.

Recently a user complained (politely) to me about the practice. It seems to him that it removes control from all editors besides myself over the content. He believes it is tantamount to WP:OWNED of the pages affected. He also points out that there is no public mention of the fact anywhere on wikipedia, and that is true, through my own oversight, until now.

There was no intent that the pages affected should be owned by myself; in fact, one of my reasons for building these pages was to solicit (in the wikipedia way) criticism and corrections to the data, perhaps additional references that I had been unable to locate. I have regenerated the tables twice in the days since they were originally placed. Each time I did so, I performed a diff between the current version and the version that I put up in the previous cycle; all corrections were then either entered into the database or corrected in the programming, as appropriate. As may be guessed, the programming corrections were frequent to start out as suggestions about the table formatting were raised, and most incorporated. I have not made judgements on the "usefulness" of corrections; all have been incorporated, or I have communicated directly with the editor to settle the matter. In fact it was in pursuing such a correction that this matter came up.

I am posting this comment on the Talk page of every page containing content which is so generated. If you would like to comment on this matter, please go to the copy on Talk:List of nuclear tests so the discussion can be kept together. I will also be placing a maintained template on each Talk page (if anyone would like also to be named as a maintainer on one or all pages, you are welcome). I solicit all comments and suggestions.

SkoreKeep (talk) 04:46, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

"Somewhat contrived"?!

In the comment section of 'Frigate bird', it says "if somewhat contrived". What exactly is that supposed to mean?--Cancun771 (talk) 17:04, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Operation Dominic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20150329041813/http://www.navy.mil:80/navydata/cno/n87/usw/issue_24/frigate_bird.htm to http://www.navy.mil/navydata/cno/n87/usw/issue_24/frigate_bird.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120823152154/http://www.dtra.mil/documents/ntpr/historical/T24298.pdf to http://www.dtra.mil/documents/ntpr/historical/T24298.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:16, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

film released

Lawrence Livermore labs has released the film of this test. No doubt it is a government work that could be copied to Wikimedia Commons?104.163.144.60 (talk) 03:51, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Operation Dominic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131029194805/http://docs.nrdc.org/nuclear/files/nuc_02019401a_121.pdf to http://docs.nrdc.org/nuclear/files/nuc_02019401a_121.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061012160826/http://www.nv.doe.gov/library/publications/historical/DOENV_209_REV15.pdf to http://www.nv.doe.gov/library/publications/historical/DOENV_209_REV15.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:18, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Largest Nuclear Weapons Testing Program Claim

For the claim that Operation Dominic was "the largest nuclear weapons testing program ever conducted by the United States" needing a citation, I crossed checked the yields totals of multiple tests using a script to retrieve the total, and crossed checked it with this site as well, and Operation Dominic appears to have a total of 38099.60 kt used, which is significantly higher than any other test conducted before, and also the last series of tests conducted.

Probably one of the sources cited on the page below references this as the largest ever if an explicit source is required, however, I haven't double checked them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.71.220.106 (talk) 00:51, 16 February 2024 (UTC)