Talk:Operation Cockade
 | A fact from Operation Cockade appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 18 March 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Two things...
edit(A) What does page 248 of Cruickshank have to do with anything?
(B) {{Citation}} and {{cite book}} aren't supposed to be mixed, but as I never use {citation}, I was too lazy to figure out how to convert the {cite book} you have in the Bibliography section. :) —Ed 17 (Talk / Contribs) 16:45, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
- Fixed them both Ed. Thanks for pointing that out. A lot of edits in just over three hours... TARTARUS talk 17:49, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
Order of Battle
editHas anyone been able to find out the notional Order of Battle for Operation Cockade? From what little I know there were two main fictional armies involved in addition to the real units. They were, the Sixth British Army (II Corps(Unknown Divisions), ? Corps (Unknown Divisions)) and the Fourth British Army (OOB different from the one in Operation Fortitude).Graham1973 (talk) 13:41, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
Zero losses for the Allies?
editThe Eighth Air Force would disagree. Crew losses were not insubstantial, see the chronicles. 46.138.82.223 (talk) 07:36, 21 February 2012 (UTC)