Talk:One by One (Cher song)

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Kyle Peake in topic GA Review
Good articleOne by One (Cher song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 3, 2023Good article nomineeListed
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on One by One (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:38, 31 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:One by One (Cher song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 07:31, 2 September 2023 (UTC)Reply


I will get on with this right away today! --K. Peake 07:31, 2 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a. (reference section):  
    b. (citations to reliable sources):  
    c. (OR):  
    d. (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a. (major aspects):  
    b. (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):  
    b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/fail:  

(Criteria marked   are unassessed)

Infobox and lead

edit
  • adult contemporary should not be capitalised in the infobox
  • Pipe R&B to Contemporary R&B in above
  • Replace hlist with bullet points per Template:Infobox song
  • Add the co-written part to the second sentence with the two versions recorded part since they wrote both of them too
  • rock and adult contemporary needn't be capitalised
  • Pipe DJ to Disc jockey
  • "released "One by One" as" → "released the song as"
  • Remove the after part since that is not notable for lead
  • "as It's a Man's World's lead single" → "as the lead single"
  • "the single was met with positive reviews" → "the song received positive reviews"
  • "In the United Kingdom, it reached" → "In the UK, the song reached"
  • "top ten." → "top 10." per MOS:NUM and mention the name of the chart
  • "where it barely cracked the" → "barely cracking the"
  • "singing the track from" → "singing the song from"

  Done

Background

edit
  • "She starred in" → "she starred in" per this being part of the same sentence
  • "Having turned down films" → "having turned down films" though the quote says infomercial diva instead and the other two parts are not sourced
Source 1 (NYT, Queen of the comebacks) - "...an embarrassing interlude as an infomercial queen" Source 3 EW - "...just devastating to my career"
  • Why is there [] for the infomercials when that is part of the original quote?
  • "career", she recalled." → "career", Cher recalled."
  • Where is the commercial failure sourced?
Source 1 (NYT, Queen of the comebacks)- "...died at the box office two weeks after it opened last April"
  • "She came to" → "Cher came to" and add the year for If These Walls Could Talk
  • "Her first studio album since 1991's Love Hurts, Cher saw" → "The record was Cher's first studio album since 1991's Love Hurts; she saw"
  • "of challenging herself;" → "of challenging herself,"
  • "of bored with it"." → "of bored with it.""
  • Pipe covers to Cover version
  • "and The Real People member" → "and the Real People member" per MOS:THEMUSIC

  Done

Composition and remix

edit
  • rock and adult contemporary should not be capitalised on the audio sample text
  • Pipe R&B to Contemporary R&B on the sample text
  • ""One by One" has been described" → "Musically, "One by One" has been described"
  • rock and adult contemporary should not be capitalised
  • "It begins with" → "The song begins with"
  • Remove overly obvious wikilink on guitars
  • "In the refrain she sings" → "In the refrain, she sings"
  • [8][6] should be in numerical order
  • Pipe R&B to Contemporary R&B
  • "as they felt it would" → "as they felt the version would"
  • Pipe DJ to Disc jockey

  Done

Release and promotion

edit
  • Wikilink music video on the img text
  • "as well as her own" → "and her own"
  • "In the United States, it was released on May 21 as" → "In the US, it was released on May 21, 1996, as" per MOS:US
  • Wikilink lead single
  • Pipe Billboard to Billboard (magazine)
  • "In the United States," → "In the US,"
  • [6][11] should only be at the end of the sentence and in numerical order
  • Remove overly obvious wikilink on Los Angeles

  Done

Reception

edit

Critical

edit
  • "that the original version was" → "that the original version is"
  • Remove pipe on Billboard
  • "opined it was a" → "opined the song is a"
  • "sweet as can be"." → "sweet as can be."" per MOS:QUOTE on full sentences
  • "said it was one of" → "said the song is one of"
  • "PopMatters Peter Piatkowski highlighted its" → "PopMatters' Peter Piatkowski highlighted the"

Commercial

edit
  • [26] should be invoked after June 15, 1996 instead
  • "for fourteen weeks in total." → "for 14 weeks in total." per MOS:NUM
  • "It found more success on the" → "It found more success on the US"
  • "at number 6 and 7," → "at numbers six and seven,"
  • "came in at number 9." → "came in at number nine."
  • "where it reached" → "where the song reached"
  • "In the United Kingdom," → "In the UK,"
  • "her first top ten hit" → "her first top 10 hit"
  • "chart it came in" → "chart, it came in"

  Done

Track listings and formats

edit
  • Good

Credits and personnel

edit
  • Good

Charts

edit

Weekly charts

edit

Year-end charts

edit
  • See MOS:TABLECAPTION

Notes

edit
  • Good

References

edit

Bibliography

edit

  Done

edit
  • Good

Final comments and verdict

edit
Thanks for yet another great review @Kyle Peake:! I believe I have fixed everything you've pointed out; let me know if i've missed anything --Christian (talk) 21:40, 2 September 2023 (UTC)Reply