Date of birth

edit

Is this source good enough?

https://m.timesofindia.com/topic/Olivia-Taylor-Dudley/videos --109.40.65.177 (talk) 02:21, 1 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Not sure. I lean in the direction of "no", because that looks like it might have just been pulled off IMDb... I think for this, we would want a stronger source where it was clear that the info was part of the source's own research. At this point, a profile of Dudley that at least mentions an age would be welcome. --IJBall (contribstalk) 03:53, 1 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
What about this? https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=10159395965030214 .... or this? www.fashionlady.in/olivia-taylor-dudley-latest-news/113295 Or posts on her own social media? https://www.instagram.com/p/BpzazIJBLkT/ I think at least the fashionlady source is that much more complete that it can't be an imdb copy. I split the link in two parts as wikipedia blacklists it for some reason. I hope it's still ok as posting it in here isn't meant to be spam. --2003:E8:7F12:1B24:34A5:1B45:88DF:5F5 (talk) 00:23, 25 July 2019 (UTC)Reply
The first is a "no" – it violates WP:ABOUTSELF. The third one would only verify a day, not a "year of birth" or an age, so I don't think it's useful for WP:DOB. The only one that might work is the second one, but I don't know if it's a WP:RS – my guess is that it's not, especially because it's on Wikipedia's "blacklist", so I think it's no good. However, the third one, combined with a WP:RS profile that gives Dudley's age, would be acceptable. --IJBall (contribstalk) 00:29, 25 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:51, 4 March 2020 (UTC)Reply