Talk:Olaf Presents
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Theleekycauldron in topic Did you know nomination
 | A fact from Olaf Presents appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 December 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 21:20, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
( )
- ... that in an article about Olaf Presents, a writer praised that Olaf points out Mufasa eats some of his subjects? Source: [1]
- ALT0a: ... that a Screen Rant article about Olaf Presents praises Olaf's acknowledgement that Mufasa eats some of his subjects?
- ALT0b:... that in Olaf Presents, the line where Olaf points out Mufasa eats some of his subjects was praised by Screen Rant?
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Digimon Adventure (film)
Created by Pamzeis (talk). Self-nominated at 10:00, 19 November 2021 (UTC).
... New enough, long enough, referenced. QPQ provided, no image. Hook is in article and in the following citation. No copyvio issues detected. Hook length okay. Thank you, looks straight forward. Whispyhistory (talk) 05:59, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Pamzeis: given Screen Rant's "no consensus" on reliability for WP:RSP, I'd attribute to them in the hook. I suggested an ALT0a, does it work for you? theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/she?) 10:44, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oops, Pamzeis? theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/she?) 10:44, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- FTR, Screen Rant is not a "no consensus" source but a
marginally reliable source ... [that] is considered reliable for entertainment-related topics, but should not be used for controversial statements related to living persons
, but that's mostly besides the point. I'm not really a fan of ALT0a because it doesn't really say "hooky" to me. I've suggested ALT0b (which is in the passive voice but I'd prefer to mention Screen Rant later to not take away from the hookiness). Pamzeis (talk) 12:41, 8 December 2021 (UTC)- Promoter's comment: Sounds good; cheers! theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/she?) 21:20, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- FTR, Screen Rant is not a "no consensus" source but a
