Talk:Nunc pro tunc

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Latin Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Latin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LatinWikipedia:WikiProject LatinTemplate:WikiProject LatinLatin articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Lord Chancellor#Former judicial functions|Lord Chancellor]] The anchor (#Former judicial functions) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

this article needs work

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article is a mess grammatically at certain points. And the several of the statements of law are misleading and possibly incorrect. At the very least, they suggest a generality that is inappropriate. This article needs substantial work and ought to have a warning on the main page (I don't know how to put those stub, etc. warnings in, but somebody should).

-- but the "contradicts itself" flag doesn't seem to be the right one. 68.213.98.28 20:14, 12 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Arkansas bar exam

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

When I took the Arkansas bar exam it not only had essay and multiple choice sections, but also a definitional section, requiring the applicant to provide a definition for a legal term, e.g., "What is a check?" The story I heard then was that when test-takers were asked to define "nunc pro tunc" back in the 1970's, one applicant wrote "He's a Vietnamese general." They gave him 5 points for trying, or so the story went. --Zeno Cosini~enwiki (talk) 02:16, 26 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic