Talk:North Clyde Line

Latest comment: 4 years ago by DMBanks1 in topic Citations

Pyrotec 23:14, 09 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Untitled

edit

Two stations have been (inadvertently?) transposed on the schematic diagram on the RH side of the article - in the panel headed by the title (in reversed-out white print on blue background): North Clyde Line (Table 226). Easterhouse and Springburn (for Cumbernauld Line) should be switched round. I cannot seem to do this myself, but I presume a more skilled volunteer may be able to.

This information is available from many sources, most obviously the Network Diagrams contained in the Network Rail (UK national) timetable: the relevant one for this correction is the Network Diagram for Tables 220, 223, 224, 226, 232.

Lionel G Holmes (lionel@homebound.org.uk) Lgholmes (talk) 11:55, 17 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Trouble archiving links on the article

edit

Hello. I am finding myself repeatedly archiving links on this page. This usually happens when the archive doesn't recognize the archive to be good.

This could be because the link is either a redirect, or I am unknowingly archiving a dead link. Please check the following links to see if it's redirecting, or in anyway bad, and fix them, if possible.

In any event this will be the only notification in regards to these links, and I will discontinue my attempts to archive these pages.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:21, 13 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on North Clyde Line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:03, 20 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on North Clyde Line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:54, 30 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Citations

edit

The Railways of Glasgow, post-Beeching, Gordon D. Webster (2014) appears to be a reliable source. The google book omits key pages, and like the complete e-book lacks page numbering, which is a problem. When libraries reopen, perhaps Scottish contributors could determine if this is also true for the hardcopy. If this is the case, is their an accepted methodology to specify a respective page for citation purposes? DMBanks1 (talk) 14:50, 30 May 2020 (UTC)Reply