Talk:North Carolina Highway 122
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Dough4872 in topic GA Review
North Carolina Highway 122 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: November 28, 2016. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:North Carolina Highway 122/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Dough4872 (talk · contribs) 02:13, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- When mentioning the road turns left or right, it would be better to indicate the compass direction it turns instead of turning left or right in order to give a better sense of direction.
- "residential zone consisting entirely of small homes" is unnecessarily wordy, just say "residential zone".
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- The lead is a little short and a few more details can be added such as more information about the towns and highways along the route and how wide the road is.
- In the route description, you should mention how wide the route is and whether or not it is a divided highway.
- "NC 122 did not appear on North Carolina state maps until 1931, as a primarily graded route running from NC 12 east of Tarboro to NC 125 in Hobgood.", what is NC 12 at the original terminus called now?
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- An image of the road would be nice, but not required.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
I will place the article on hold for some fixes to be made. Dough4872 02:29, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- @Dough4872: I believe most of the edits have been done. Unfortunately I have not found a picture of the highway since it is very rural.--Ncchild (talk) 02:58, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- I will now pass the article. Dough4872 03:29, 28 November 2016 (UTC)