Talk:North American O-47
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the North American O-47 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
External links modified (January 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on North American O-47. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927151444/http://www.planesoffame.org/index.php?page=restoration-projects. to http://www.planesoffame.org/index.php?page=restoration-projects.
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120303082249/http://www.boeing.com/history/bna/o47.htm to http://www.boeing.com/history/bna/o47.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:22, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
"Lost" version
editWhy no mention of the version flown/shown in the 1964 movie "The Flight of the Phoenix" ? ? ?
Especially since the aircraft is specifically mentioned in the 'Flight' article/entry.
Just curious. 2600:8800:C89:EA00:C23F:D5FF:FEC4:D51D (talk) 22:09, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
- Probably because no one has cited a reliable published source for it. It's unsourced in the movie article either, and should probably be removed until reliable sources are found. BilCat (talk) 22:29, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
Would some info about capabilities be welcome also in infobox?
editCould some of capabilities also be stated in infobox (e.g. max and cruise speed, range...), not just far down in the body of the article? I am not at home with airplane articles to know if it's common to have them there. Marjan Tomki SI (talk) 15:25, 14 February 2024 (UTC)