Talk:NoSQL
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the NoSQL article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 180 days  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
Redirect to new filter, map, reduce article?
editThe vast majority of "no SQL" databases that are actually described that way (as opposed to network databases, semantic web techs like triple stores, object-oriented databases and other ways of storing data) are using the "filter, map, reduce" paradigm. The current article on MapReduce inanely describes it as Google-specific with Riak and many other tools support similar functions.
Further reading
editI propose to add my carefully crafted text book on Advanced Data Management to the further reading section. As opposed to existing books focusing mainly on the technical (installation and configuration) aspects of modern data stores, this is the first textbook on NoSQL systems providing full coverage of the theoretical background of modern data stores as well as a comprehensive survey of seminal scientific approaches in the data management literature of the last decades.
importance?
editNot sure this should be importance=top for CS (see Category:Top-importance Computer science articles). Probably high. Thoughts? Caleb Stanford (talk) 18:18, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
"is one of the simplest non-trivial data models"
editOn what basis are we calling K-V pairs a simple but non-trivial data model? One could argue that it is both simple *and* trivial. And even that one is hard-pressed to imagine a more trivial data model. 🤔 Toddcs (talk) 21:03, 21 October 2023 (UTC)