Talk:Ninety-five Theses/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Coemgenus (talk · contribs) 16:01, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

I'll review this one over this next few days. --Coemgenus (talk) 16:01, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Checklist

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Comments

Images

• Everything is appropriately licensed and captioned.

Stability

• No edit wars or on-going talk page issues.

Background

• Is there a citation for the sentence that begins "This led to the popular saying..." I've heard it before, but it feels like something that needs a cite. (Or does the cite after the next sentence cover it?)

• The cite at the end of the next sentence covers it.--JFH (talk) 16:11, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

General comments

• Other than that one minor point, I have nothing to critique here. Excellent article, I look forward to promoting it.
• Unrelated to whether this article passes GA: it might be good to translate Hieronymus Schulz for an article on en-wiki. --Coemgenus (talk) 16:19, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

• Thank you very much, Coemgenus. I am planning to get that one and several others started up as part of an effort to take over DYK on 31 October. --JFH (talk) 16:11, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

• Great, good luck with those. I'm happy to pass this one, and I enjoyed reading it. --Coemgenus (talk) 16:27, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.