Talk:Nina Agdal

Photo?

If not copyrighted, pictures enhance a WP article. -- AstroU (talk) 20:12, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

@AstroU: Isn't her smile enchanting? Zwerg Nase (talk) 14:29, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Yes. And clicking on 'images' with a Google-search on her name is revealing (recent modeling, 2015) -- AstroU (talk) 23:40, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Content dispute

The article has been fully protected due to edit warring. Please try to resolve the content dispute here on the talk page or make use of dispute resolution if necessary. See WP:FULL for instructions on how to make an edit request while the page is still protected.

I also urge participants in this discussion to familiarize themselves with the Biographies of living persons policy, especially WP:BLPGOSSIP and WP:GRAPEVINE.

Finally, the pre-edit war version that I restored is this one.

Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:12, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

I am of the opinion that the various "this person dated this other notable person" stuff is trivia and doesn't belong in an encyclopedia article. Mentioning a current spouse or relationship I think is fine, but what benefit is there to a reader of listing a bunch of "this person dated soandso" sourced to not-exactly-top-quality sources? firefly ( t · c ) 16:55, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

If Leonardo DiCaprio can have extended information about his previous dating history, why is this not appropraite for Nina Agdel? I understand the recent controversy and cyberbullying online, but I wish to understand how this is irrelevant in this case? JuliusAlexander96 (talk) 15:03, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

I agree with Julius. Someone’s gone through and deleted various dating histories associated with the two of them, and there is no doubt in my mind that the Dillon Dannis situation is the reason. Wikipedia is not supposed to be a platform that hides information, but brings it to light. Nate Rybner 12:43, 15 October 2023 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Naterybner (talk • contribs)

I particularly take issue with On July 9, 2023, Paul posted photos of his proposal to Agdal on his Instagram account. Who cares?! firefly ( t · c ) 16:56, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

As happens, we are now at the WRONGVERSION with respect to BLP and gossip. This edit by Firefly is much better, with just the engagement announcement. Binksternet (talk) 17:31, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

Hi,

Should there be some mention of the Dillon Dannis lawsuit and controversy? I will admit, I have only ever heard of her because of it. It is all over social media. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.150.152.90 (talk) 08:44, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

Ridiculousness MTV Show

is it possible to maybe add something about her being on the show Ridiculousness

she has done at least 57 episodes and a failed spinoff called grossness Mike10dude (talk) 09:20, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

If her being on the show frequently has been significantly covered in reliable sources other than MTV, it's probably a reasonable thing to add with one or two citations to back it up. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:24, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

external link to swimsuit photo galaries

should be https://swimsuit.si.com/swimsuit/model/nina-agdal 73.182.174.104 (talk) 21:34, 13 May 2024 (UTC)