This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
Latest comment: 4 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
Greetings @Alexis Jazz, I see you have added a "cleanup translation" template to the page. While this was appropriate because the original commit was a translation from the Spanish Wikipedia, I believe this is no longer needed. If you check the old revision [1], you can see that it is quite clearly a mess and needed substantial cleanup to even make sense in English. But that was years ago, and now practically ever sentence is referenced to an English source. Factual accuracy can be checked simply by following the reference links, and reading the English info there. I personally have done so (and worked on) the article before, so I would vouch that it currently contains no major errors. I would appreciate someone verifying this, but a comparison with the Spanish Wikipedia's version does no longer make sense, since the English one here is now superior. Which is why I believe the template is no longer needed. --LordPeterII (talk) 21:24, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
@Alexis Jazz: Fair enough; I must admit I didn't question it too much at the time because it was referenced to on the German Wikipedia article. But you are right, it doesn't seem to be very reliable. Can't find the info elsewhere atm and it's not important anyway, so I have just removed it. --LordPeterII (talk) 10:35, 25 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
.jpg){kind=small}
