Talk:New Zealand men's national football team results (2000–2019)
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 5 October 2007. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Results
editIs there a reason why the results only go back to 1999?
Apart from the obvious 1982 world cup matches and the qualifying games there are plenty of other good results that can be added here. 219.89.20.104 (talk) 21:13, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
Results by year table
editPercentage win calculation is nonsensical. Percentage wins should be just that - number of wins ÷ number of games played. Apart from anything else, prior to 1970something there were only 2 points allocated for a win, which makes the current column in the table just made up information.--ClubOranjeT 10:09, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
- Then remove it. I havent finished it anyway and it was gonna take a while to sort the rest out. I kinda got the feeling that it didnt really show much anyway while i was doing it O for Awesome (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 20:43, 29 June 2010 (UTC).
Format
editThe format as it stands now (before Mr Hall of England's edits) is the best format for the purpose.
It holds far more information about each match and streamlines the page much more than your version, Mr Hall of England. If you still think there is value in your edits, please discuss them here first, so we do not start an editing war.O for Awesome (talk) 01:00, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
Article has exceeded template limits and thus needs to be split
editHi O for Awesome, I see that you previously created New Zealand national football team results 1922–69. As this page is in Category:Pages where template include size is exceeded (a category I patrol), it needs to be split again, perhaps to New Zealand national football team results 1970–99. You will notice that the current article display is all messed up, as many templates are not transcluding. Regards, Wbm1058 (talk) 21:23, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
- Oh wow, that's weird. Usually it would do a lot more than it is currently. Thanks for letting me know and sorry for the delayed response. I will get right on it. O for Awesome (talk) 19:23, 22 March 2015 (UTC)