Talk:New York State Route 118
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Admrboltz in topic GA Review
 | New York State Route 118 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: December 12, 2013. (Reviewed version). |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change of Intersection Template
editThis article was changed to bring its intersection template to the NYint format. No other changes were made. It is important to verify, update and/or correct as necessary.Fwgoebel 22:21, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:New York State Route 118/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Admrboltz (talk · contribs) 17:38, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Looks good, just a few housekeeping items before passing. --AdmrBoltz 17:55, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
Prose
edit- With your 1905/7 amounts, can you use the {{inflation}} template to provide more current amounts?
- The jct list needs a key / footer.
Images
edit- File:NY-118.svg should be tagged as {{PD-USGov-MUTCD}}.
- Still hate that inflation template. If these template upgrades don't make that easier, protest will ensue. Everything is changed for the record. Also, may I ask leaving my GANs alone, personal preference and request at WT:USRD that USRD editors abstain from reviewing my articles. Mitch32(New digs, new life, same old stubborn.) 20:02, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
- Looks good to me. Would you prefer if I put out for a second opinion, or would you like me to pass it.? --AdmrBoltz 20:09, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
- Pass it, just a note for the future. Mitch32(New digs, new life, same old stubborn.) 22:06, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
- Looks good to me. Would you prefer if I put out for a second opinion, or would you like me to pass it.? --AdmrBoltz 20:09, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
- Still hate that inflation template. If these template upgrades don't make that easier, protest will ensue. Everything is changed for the record. Also, may I ask leaving my GANs alone, personal preference and request at WT:USRD that USRD editors abstain from reviewing my articles. Mitch32(New digs, new life, same old stubborn.) 20:02, 12 December 2013 (UTC)