Talk:Neocatastrophism
 | A fact from Neocatastrophism appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 18 December 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
A couple of questions
edit1. By a look at sources, the term seems to be used in the meaning indicated by the article mostly, if not only, by Vukotic and Cirkovic. Are there occurrences of the term by independent researchers as an established term in this respect? There are other occurrences of the term "neocatastrophism" but they seem to be related to earthquakes and archaeology, see here for example. In any case, we probably need to disambiguate.
- Yes I agree. I did a little checking and it appears that neocatastrophism is almost always used in the context of geology. In particular, it originated with Otto H. Schindewolf in 1962.–RJH (talk) 00:16, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
2. In the meaning described by the article, could a merge with Rare Earth hypothesis make sense? It seems to me there is significant overlap between the concepts. --Cyclopiatalk 15:36, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
other comment
edit3. If this was such a significant catastrophic event, then why are WE here? I'll take my answer off the air...(so to speak)212.149.205.113 (talk) 19:41, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
- We're not here to debate the subject, but the article. --Cyclopiatalk 00:04, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
- Well, it is a somewhat valid point in that the event must allow for some rate of survival. Otherwise we wouldn't be here talking about it.—RJH (talk) 00:19, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
Catastrophic geologic events?
editApart from cosmic collisions, there seems to be quite a bit of writing on new catastrophism being reintroduced to interpretations of geology and paleontology by Derek Ager and others... from what I understand these new views now dominate current geological thinking, yet there doesn't seem to be much mention of it either here or in the uniformitarinism articles. 72.95.92.54 (talk) 03:20, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
External links modified (February 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Neocatastrophism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://www.aob.bg.ac.rs/paob/86/pdf/193-196.pdf - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090326090244/http://www.cc.nctu.edu.tw/~tseng327/nctu-origin/article/sc200007a.pdf to http://www.cc.nctu.edu.tw/~tseng327/nctu-origin/article/sc200007a.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:50, 15 February 2018 (UTC)