This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article follows the Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Legal. It uses the Bluebook legal referencing style. This citation style uses standardized abbreviations, such as "N.Y. Times" for The New York Times. Please review those standards before making style or formatting changes. Information on this referencing style may be obtained at: Cornell's Basic Legal Citation site.
Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
I think there were three more judges that sat on this case at the appellate level (total 5). Could somebody with ready access to the relevant UK reports check that? By the way, Baron Parke was the trial judge and he ruled the opposite way at trial than he did on appeal. Thx. PraeceptorIP (talk) 15:30, 4 August 2015 (UTC)Reply
Baron Parke said: "In the case of Neilson v. Harford, at the request of my Lord Abinger, I proceed to deliver his Lordship’s judgment, and that of the rest of the Court, on this question." Who is Abinger?
