Talk:Native American tribes in Nebraska

Missing former reservations?

A small portion of Dakota Territories was transferred back Nebraska in 1882. On that small strip were the Ponca IR, southern 1/4 of the Lower Brule IR (not the same Lower Brule IR of today), and a very small tract of the Upper Brule IR (which a considerably smaller tract remains today as the Rosebud IR). I'm pretty certain the Upper and Lower Brule IRs are missing from the list, but I'm still trying to confirm if the Ponca IR was a separate IR or if it was part of the Niobara IR (which a considerably smaller tract remains today as the Santee Sioux IR). Any insights before adding these 2 or 3 IRs into the article? CJLippert (talk) 18:35, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Citations, citations! My only thought is that you should have citations for these. In my research for the article I don't remember coming across information about these, but I would love to! Please share your sources and I'll be a happy researcher. • Freechild'sup? 05:31, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

See:

• File:1886rail-usgenweb-mapproject.jpg (this map is found in the Dakota Territory article)
• 1885 and 1889 Rand, McNally & Co: Nebraska at David Rumsey Historical Map Collection
• 1885 Holt and Knox Counties (but the Brown and Keyapaha don't show anything), Everts & Kirk: Nebraska, also at David Rumsey

Also, before adding any of these, in addition to the Ponca IR issue already stated, I need to find out if the Dakota IR that are found on the Everts & Kirk is accurate or not, as I thought Dakota IR got broken up a few years earlier into the various contiguous IR blocks that got whittled down to what now are non-contiguous blocks that they are today. Anything before 1882 in that strip would be part of Dakota Territory's history and not Nebraska's. CJLippert (talk) 14:25, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Which Pine Ridge?

In the section "Tribes and treaties", the last entry in the table is for an 1892 treaty in which the Lakota "ceded a parcel of land including Pine Ridge, Nebraska". Pine Ridge, Nebraska, now known as Whiteclay, Nebraska, is a rather small unincorporated community. Should this, instead, be Pine Ridge (region)? Unfortunately, the source cited isn't online, so I can't check it. Can someone who follows this article do so? Thanks. Ammodramus (talk) 22:13, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Native American tribes in Nebraska. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080516060757/http://www.winnebagotribe.com:80/winbagoFrameset-1.htm to http://www.winnebagotribe.com/winbagoFrameset-1.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:25, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Native American tribes in Nebraska. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121014185328/http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/31000.html to http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/31000.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111211144741/http://www.nebraskastudies.org/0500/media/0503_010002.jpg to http://www.nebraskastudies.org/0500/media/0503_010002.jpg

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:20, 14 February 2018 (UTC)