Talk:National Register of Historic Places listings in Passaic County, New Jersey
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
merge/consolidate/separate/disambiguate/link/address
edit- Great Falls (Passaic River)
- Old Great Falls Historic District
- Great Falls of Paterson-Garrett Mountain
- Garret Mountain Reservation
- National Register of Historic Places listings in Passaic County, New Jersey mentions S.U.M. in listing
- Paterson, New Jersey#Lambert Castle Museum
The above articles, whilst focusing on a different aspect of the Falls do cover alot of the same material and do refer to each other. Is it actually necessary? It certainly is confusing and starts getting circuitous. Is there some way they can be consoldated? The distinction between the falls and the mountain are clear, though there may be some jurisdictional differences regarding the what is included in the various municpal, state and national designations. Thoughts?Djflem (talk) 18:32, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
Seperation and Consolidation
editYikes... that is a bit confusing.
It would think that Great Falls of Paterson-Garrett Mountain could be very easily consolidated into the Great Falls (Passaic River). Probably make it a redirect to specific section on the Falls' Natural Landmark status. This section could then have a link to Garret Mountain Reservation in it.
The Old Great Falls Historic District is essentially a neighborhood of Paterson. Having an article for it is totally redundant. Stoney Road should also be wholly consolidated into Paterson,_NJ#Neighborhoods as well.
The information in the section Paterson, New Jersey#Lambert Castle Museum would be better off in an actual article on Lambert Castle. An article for Lambert Castle would also centralize all information pertaining to it, thus removing random tidbits in other articles. An article would also reinforce the castle's distinction, as it is not a part of Garret Mountain Reservation (just happens to border it) or the Great Falls Historic District.
What d'ya think? Lithium6ion (talk) 19:23, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
Photos needed - finding aid only
editReferences
- ^ Numbers represent an alphabetical ordering by significant words. Various colorings, defined here, differentiate National Historic Landmarks and historic districts from other NRHP buildings, structures, sites or objects.
- ^ "National Register Information System". National Register of Historic Places. National Park Service. April 24, 2008.
- ^ The eight-digit number below each date is the number assigned to each location in the National Register Information System database, which can be viewed by clicking the number.
- ^ http://www.state.nj.us/dep/hpo/1identify/lists/passaic.pdf Accessed June 29, 2010
- ^ http://www.state.nj.us/dep/hpo/1identify/lists/passaic.pdf Accessed June 29, 2010.
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on National Register of Historic Places listings in Passaic County, New Jersey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110819220847/http://www.state.nj.us/dep/hpo/1identify/lists/passaic.pdf to http://www.state.nj.us/dep/hpo/1identify/lists/passaic.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110819220847/http://www.state.nj.us/dep/hpo/1identify/lists/passaic.pdf to http://www.state.nj.us/dep/hpo/1identify/lists/passaic.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:25, 22 May 2017 (UTC)