This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of awards and prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I just wanted to comment that since the page contains a list of all the awards given up to 2018, I am adding (as I can) the winners of the 2019 - 21 awards. However, someone previously red-lettered every single name that didn't have a Wikipedia page. This is a pretty decent award, and quite a few writers who have won one do indeed have Wikipedia pages, but to red-letter every single winner who doens't have a page is not selective and made the page a sea of red. I hope this edit is okay. I think if editors look through the list of people and recognize some names that they think should have a Wikipedia page, it would be fine to red-letter those names, but to red-letter literally a couple of hundred people seemed very excessive. Thank you Geophiliac (talk) 02:48, 14 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
