Talk:National Building Museum

	museums portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Architecture

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States: District of Columbia Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Washington, D.C. portal This article is supported by WikiProject District of Columbia (assessed as Mid-importance).

National Register of Historic Places High‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Main image dispute

Latest comment: 16 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

I reverted the article back to the condition it was in when I added Image 1, below. I believe this better represents the subject than the previous photo that User:AgnosticPreachersKid replaced mine with. I cite the now-inactive but still relevant appropriate illustrations: image purpose policy. Image 1 shows the National Building Museum from the front at a normal angle. It's centered and displays one of the main architectural elements of the building: the large vaulted roof and its tall windows. Image 2 is taken at an odd angle, and shows the side, not the main entrance, as does Image 1. AgnosticPreachersKid's reason for replacement was time the photo was taken. While Image 1 is a year or two old, the view has not changed, and IMO the quality and completeness of Image 1 easily trumps the age reference made by AgnosticPreachersKid. Note that National building museum3.jpg has also been used. It is identical to Image 2 and was used in List of museums in Washington, D.C. which I also reverted to use Image 1. ~~See its discussion page.~~ I am not just trying to get my photo back up (yes, Image 1 is my creation); I am fully happy with somebody replacing this with something of higher quailty. I feel Image 2 does not better represent the subject at hand.

Please be sure to leave comments regarding this.

Image 1: National Building Museum photo I prefer.

Image 2: User:AgnosticPreachersKid's preference.

~ Wadester16 (talk) 23:41, 25 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Update: National building museum3.jpg (Image 3 below), referenced above, is not identical to Image 2, but is extremely similar. Neither should be used instead of Image 1, IMO. Note that while there's a three year difference between the two but no notable difference.

Image 2: AgnosticPreachersKid's photo.

Image 3: Image 2's twin.

Wadester16 (talk) 00:01, 26 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

While not particularly thrilled with the words " normal angle." I will agree that Image 1 is the best. However, more or less the same picture taken when the main facade is sunlit, thereby revealing the red color of the building (plus a bit more definition of Caspar Buberl's frieze would in my opinion, trump them all. In fact, my picture on Buberl's page . . .................... Carptrash (talk) 01:04, 26 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Agreed. While I'm not a photographer (technically or creatively), I try my best (no tripod, no manual-adjust lens, etc); this is admittedly just a snapshot from a cheap digital camera taken because I was in the area. Oh and I define my world with my engineering terms (hence normal angle). With respect to the details, they would appear in separate photos that show off their aspects, not in the main photo (IMO); do you have some to contribute? I am completely open to replacing Image 1 should one with better lighting, technical quality, etc, come around; indeed I would support it. My point is just with respect to comparing these two photos, i.e. working with what we've got. ~ Wadester16 (talk) 03:41, 26 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Summit on Financial Markets and the World Economy

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The G20 summit took place here today. Could this be mentioned along with the inaugural balls and Hillary Clinton's farewell rally? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.120.126.244 (talk) 23:05, 15 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on National Building Museum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:22, 11 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (February 2018)

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on National Building Museum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100707052428/http://www.nbm.org/programs-lectures/tours/historic-building-tours.html to http://www.nbm.org/programs-lectures/tours/historic-building-tours.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:04, 13 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic