Talk:Nathan Larson (criminal)

(Redirected from Talk:Nathan Larson (politician))
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Risker in topic Image

Requested move 28 April 2023

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. (non-admin closure) Silikonz💬 13:45, 5 May 2023 (UTC)Reply



Nathan Larson (criminal)Nathan Daniel Larson – middle name is a WP:NATDAB so there isn't any need to haggle over what label to emphasize in a parenthesis LichCake (talk) 06:19, 28 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Image

edit

There's room for debate on whether to use a mugshot or a professional polished photo that makes him look like an officeholder. Per MOS:PERTINENCE, "Images must be relevant in the topic's context" - I don't think a faux-politician photo is relevant, as his actual political career was virtually non-existent. His criminal activities were what made him notable, so personally, I would go with the mugshot, although others may disagree. Wes sideman (talk) 17:37, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Most generally reliable sources portray Larson in suit and tie:
Tabloids and generally unreliable sources will tend more to portray him with the mugshot:
Local and indie news outlets are more mixed. Sometimes they go only with the mugshot, sometimes they use both pictures, a few times only the suit and tie:
Most results from WP refs portray him with both the mugshot and the suit and tie (not all sources that show up there are reliable, though). Since there doesn't seem to be a specific guideline about what image is best for using in a BLP infobox, I say we stick to the reliable sources that stood scrutiny over the years in Wikipedia and use the most formal picture. SparklyNights 18:50, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Generally speaking, the practice is to go with the most recent photograph that meets licensing requirements, and/or the photograph that is most relevant to the subject's notability. His notability is because he is a criminal, not because he looks snappy in a suit. The suit photo was uploaded by one of Larson's Wikipedia sockpuppets; in other words, it's the image by which Larson chose to be viewed by Wikipedia readers. I'd leave things as-is, or remove the suit photo. Most of the articles that show a suit photo were written several years before his kidnapping charges, and most of those outlets (if they had written an article about him at all) would have used the mugshot photo. Risker (talk) 20:23, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply