Talk:Narragansett Runestone

Latest comment: 3 months ago by Quadpower1 in topic Dead Link

Everett Brown

edit

KSpott just added a paragraph and a source which effectively changes the entire subject. Since it's only one [primary] source and the change is so significant, I'm copying it here temporarily, pending discussion or additional sources.

Everett Brown of Providence reported he carved the runes on Quidnessett Rock in summer 1964. He said he had forgotten about the incident until the stone was removed and recovered in 2013. As of this writing (June 21, 2014) he said he had contacted the Rhode Island Historical Society but had not heard back from them. The town of North Kingstown, meanwhile, announced plans to display the stone in Updike Park.[1]

References

I think that although it's a plausible explanation, we can't just take an interview with this person as factual. Primary sources like what someone says in an interview are generally not desirable as reliable sources. That being said, this blog, Stone Wings, does itself appear to be fairly well-written and was not set up expressly for this purpose and so I don't think it should be dismissed, either.

My opinion is that we wait for at least one secondary source to write about this, then cite both the secondary source and this Stone Wings interview in the context of "local teen Everett Brown claims to have made the markings" along with a brief account of his story unless some further investigative work is done. --— Rhododendrites talk17:29, 21 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

PS: This is a point less relevant to the content in question, but KSpott please also see WP:COI about adding sources you wrote yourself (it's considered a form of self-promotion and causes problems for Wikipedia's policy of editing with a neutral point of view). Not a big deal in this case, but frowned upon. --— Rhododendrites talk17:32, 21 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
There's a week old news article here.[1] Dougweller (talk) 18:54, 21 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Narragansett Runestone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:30, 12 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

To add to article

edit

Basic information to add to this article (which is hard to believe was not already included): what the runes on this runestone say. 76.190.213.189 (talk) 01:57, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

The disappearance of the rock

edit

According to the New York Times, Timothy Mellon, railroad heir, was responsible for removing the rock. The article says "information by an individual"

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/28/us/politics/donald-trump-2024-campaign-timothy-mellon.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare&sgrp=c-cb Quadpower1 (talk) 22:17, 28 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

The link that refers to footnote 3 is a dead link Quadpower1 (talk) 22:19, 28 July 2024 (UTC)Reply