Talk:Napoleon points
 | A fact from Napoleon points appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 23 May 2012 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Adding to the Lead (lede) paragraphs.
editAt the end of the last paragraph in the lede, can someone add why these points are useful to know? {[(Or not)]} The Article is beautiful, instructive and informative; but it would be really a great benefit to find out why anyone but a theoretical mathematician would want to know the Napoleon points. I expected to see Napoleon generals positioning themselves or something. Are they only useful for making beautiful diagrams? That would be OK—often the theoreticians do their work and wait with their answers for the applied mathematicians and physicists to ask a question. Any application questions yet? Just asking, Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 13:48, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
External links modified (February 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Napoleon points. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120907233007/http://scimath.unl.edu/MIM/files/MATExamFiles/LaFleur%20Expository_FINAL.pdf to http://scimath.unl.edu/MIM/files/MATExamFiles/LaFleur%20Expository_FINAL.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140429191842/http://apollonius.math.nthu.edu.tw/d1/disk5/js/geometry/napoleon/9.pdf to http://apollonius.math.nthu.edu.tw/d1/disk5/js/geometry/napoleon/9.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:49, 12 February 2018 (UTC)