Talk:Napaljarri
 | A fact from Napaljarri appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 26 January 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
External links modified (February 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Napaljarri. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.clc.org.au%2FPeople_Culture%2Fkinship%2Fkinship.html&date=2010-10-11 to http://www.clc.org.au/People_Culture/kinship/kinship.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:56, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
Category Northern Territory
edit@Fayenatic london: thanks for your question. From the article text it is not clear to me at all that this article is specifically about Northern Territory. I happily stand corrected if my reading is wrong. Marcocapelle (talk) 18:41, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks – I see what you mean. Western Desert is the defining area of origin, which is wider than NT. However, the article mentions Pintupi (who were moved from Western Australia into what is now Northern Territory) and Warlpiri people (traditionally within NT), so Smasongarrison appears to have been correct as regards this article when she added the former category into Indigenous Australians in the Northern Territory. So I think it can stay on this article now. – Fayenatic London 20:36, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
- FL, you traced my exact reasoning! :) Mason (talk) 20:52, 20 February 2024 (UTC)