This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bedfordshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bedfordshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BedfordshireWikipedia:WikiProject BedfordshireTemplate:WikiProject BedfordshireBedfordshire articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nursing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Nursing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NursingWikipedia:WikiProject NursingTemplate:WikiProject NursingNursing articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Merseyside, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Merseyside-related articles. In so doing it works and collaborates with its mother project WikiProject UK Geography. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Please also feel free to join in the discussions on the project's talk page.MerseysideWikipedia:WikiProject MerseysideTemplate:WikiProject MerseysideMerseyside articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dyslexia, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.DyslexiaWikipedia:WikiProject DyslexiaTemplate:WikiProject DyslexiaDyslexia articles
Nadine Dorries is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles
"Wikipedia edits from parliament airbrush Dorries sex abuse row". Political Scrapbook. 2011-05-20. Archived from the original on 2011-05-20. Retrieved 2011-05-20. It now appears someone using a parliamentary computer has edited Dorries' entry on Wikipedia to airbrush the sorry affair from the record ... The alteration to the page, which was made yesterday afternoon from the parliamentary estate, removes references to comments that "we'd probably have less sex abuse" if girls were taught to "just say no".
Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion
she is still an MP even though she has sent her resignation to the PM, she will cease to be an MP when she is appointed to an office that is incompatible with Parliament Jord656 (talk) 17:22, 26 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
I really should get out more, but I've been checking the London Gazette every day waiting for the official publication. It's finally arrived today at half past two. I've added the reference to the article.Seaweed (talk) 16:27, 31 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
stating number of days between announcing resignation and officially resigning
Latest comment: 1 year ago5 comments2 people in discussion
Hi User:DeFacto, you have reverted my addition of the number of days between announcing resignation and officially resigning while claiming WP:UNDUE. Why? I can't see how this applies. The dates are there so all I have done is added clarity of the length of time. Gaia Octavia AgrippaTalk10:57, 5 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
It was once in the intro (where we tend to repeat details from the main body) and once in the body of the text. The addition of the number of days to the intro adds clarity and is accompanied by the reasons for the delay in the same paragraph. In the main body, there are five paragraphs between the paragraph that mentions her "with immediate effect" and the paragraph in which it states "explicitly signified her resignation as an MP". The addition of a day count between these two dates adds clarity and would be appreciated by readers who then don't have to scroll back up or to work out the time span for themselves. Gaia Octavia AgrippaTalk11:14, 5 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
I still think it's undue though, in the sense that it unduly emphasises the delay, giving more detail than is necessary, acceptable, or reasonable. -- DeFacto (talk). 12:10, 5 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
The length of delay is frequently stressed in reliable sources: BBC "In August, the former culture secretary resigned from the Commons, more than two months after pledging to go "with immediate effect"; The Times "Her drawn-out resignation, which lasted from early June when she first pledged to leave the Commons, until late August, when she finally did so"; AP News "British Conservative lawmaker Nadine Dorries stepped down from the House of Commons on Saturday, more than two months after announcing she was quitting"; The Guardian "in letter sent 11 weeks after she said she would stand down [...] Two-and-a-half months after first announcing her intention to step down as MP". Its even stressed at the likes of GB News "Dorries resigned from the Commons on Saturday, over two months after she pledged to go "with immediate effect"".
The delay is in its self notable, and stating the amount of days (once in the intro and once in the main text) is not at all an "more detail than is necessary, acceptable, or reasonable". Gaia Octavia AgrippaTalk20:37, 5 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
The Right Honourable says this (emphasis added): "The Privy Council is notionally the body of formal advisors to the sovereign. Members of the Cabinet, senior politicians, and some few other officials are appointed as members for life, and are personally entitled to be styled Right Honourable thereafter." Martinevans123 (talk) 14:10, 5 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}
Not done: Although I couldn't find the relevant policy, it seems that these titles are kept by convention even after the subject has left office or died. See Boris Johnson and Winston Churchill for examples. Liu1126 (talk) 14:08, 5 January 2024 (UTC)