Requested move

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was move all. Extraordinary Machine 13:41, 3 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Survey

edit
Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~

Discussion

edit
Add any additional comments
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on NGC 55. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:57, 10 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 18 February 2020

edit

My request is to change "NGC 55, also occasionally referred to as The Whale Galaxy," into, "NGC 55, also occasionally referred to as The Hope World Galaxy,". Here is a link to the source, [1] It will be greatly appreciated by many if this can be edited. GenSaga (talk) 17:39, 18 February 2020 (UTC) GenSaga GenSaga (talk) 17:39, 18 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

References

  Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. "Name an astronomical feature" scams are not reliable sources, no matter who buys the stupid certificate. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 18:26, 18 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
Strongly oppose: a proper name should be used in a Wikipedia article only if it is in widespread use in the astronomical literature. Buying a certificate from a company claiming to have assigned a name to a galaxy does not give any reason to use that name. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TowardsTheLight (talkcontribs) 18:46, 18 February 2020 (UTC)Reply