Talk:Muscle energy technique

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative medicine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Alternative medicine related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Alternative medicineWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative medicineTemplate:WikiProject Alternative medicineAlternative medicine articles

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chiropractic Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chiropractic, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chiropractic on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChiropracticWikipedia:WikiProject ChiropracticTemplate:WikiProject ChiropracticChiropractic articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was nominated for merging with Soft Tissue Technique on September 2012. The result of the discussion was Do not merge.

Merge with soft tissue technique

Latest comment: 10 years ago5 comments5 people in discussion

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was to not merge. Sunealoneal (talk) 04:23, 28 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

I think they ought to remain as separate articles, since they are distinct therapeutic approaches. Any confusion that may arise regarding the distinction should be addressed by improving the two articles. Those are my thoughts. Rytyho usa (talk) 23:15, 2 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

MET has a distinct etiology and is the term used by Massage therapists. I have been practicing MET fro over 20 years and am unfamiliar with the terminology Soft Tissue Technique. Tracy Firsching, BA, LMT, LNMT — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.155.246.229 (talk) 17:15, 26 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

MET should be kept distinct from other manual therapy techniques. It is unique in that it treats both muscle and structural dysfunction through both post-isometric relaxation and reciprocol inhibition. It is one of the most useful manual therapy techniques. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.144.179.26 (talk) 23:19, 29 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Yes i agree, keep MET separate as they are a separate technique which differs in the way they are applied and the mode of action, also the outcome is the movement of joints as well as stretching muscles and fascia. 213.219.49.160 (talk) 09:44, 15 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Unclear phrasing

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

"Despite the many claims made regarding the efficacy of these techniques, there are only two peer-reviewed studies that have shown that muscle energy techniques can significantly decrease disability and improve functionality in patients with disorders such as low back pain."

Does this mean that there are more studies that demonstrate no significant difference? Or just that 2 is typically not regarded as enough? Sunealoneal (talk) 04:15, 28 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Add topic