Talk:Murder of Jastine Valdez

Latest comment: 2 months ago by IntentionallyDense in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Murder of Jastine Valdez/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: WorldTravleerAndPhotoTaker (talk · contribs) 15:46, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: IntentionallyDense (talk · contribs) 21:37, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply


I will review this shortly. IntentionallyDense (talk) 21:37, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Rate Attribute Review Comment
1. Well-written:
  1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. IntentionallyDense (talk) 22:18, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
  1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. IntentionallyDense (talk) 22:18, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check:
  2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. IntentionallyDense (talk) 22:18, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). I spot-checked some of the more used refs as well as some random ones and found no issues. IntentionallyDense (talk) 22:18, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2c. it contains no original research. IntentionallyDense (talk) 22:18, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. All content is put in the writer's own words. IntentionallyDense (talk) 22:18, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
3. Broad in its coverage:
  3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. IntentionallyDense (talk) 22:18, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). IntentionallyDense (talk) 22:18, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. IntentionallyDense (talk) 22:18, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
  5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. IntentionallyDense (talk) 22:18, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
  6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. IntentionallyDense (talk) 22:18, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
  6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. IntentionallyDense (talk) 22:18, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
  7. Overall assessment. I'm going to put this review on hold until the nominator can address the issues I've outlined below. IntentionallyDense (talk) 22:18, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Article is reasonably well written, understandable, complies with MOS, is sourced and no issues with POV. Pass, good work! IntentionallyDense (talk) 22:12, 30 October 2024 (UTC)Reply