Talk:Mundaring, Western Australia

earlier comments

List Of Suburbs

I'm thinking this could be deleted. We have a category for suburbs of Perth which I suggest does the same job. Having said that, what's the normal wiki way to preserve a list of uncreated articles, sort of a ToDo list? SweenyTod 13:10, 11 July 2005 (UTC)

Oh well - you want to put them all suburbs of perth? The whole reason why the suburbs were put in there is that what's within the local government area. Perth is not the local government. I could be very wrong, but i suspect that wiki is an exploration in showing how things fit into biggger things. sorry can't answer your other questionUser:SatuSuro 14:08, 11 July 2005 (UTC)

No, you're right. I didn't realise that it was both a suburb description, and list of suburbs within the Shire of Mundaring. Perhaps it needs a category for the shire? SweenyTod 14:13, 11 July 2005 (UTC)

I haven't done a thorough check of other oz states to see if they have the local gov with lists inside or not, maybe another state has good examples of how to do it. perhaps mundaring needs a disambig for mundaring the place, the shire, the weir, etcUser:SatuSuro 23:57, 11 July 2005 (UTC)

• It is appropriate to have a single article that covers two aspects of the same place. See, for example, Laverton, Western Australia, which treats both the town of Laverton and the Shire of Laverton; and see Margaret River, Western Australia, which treats both the town and the river. On the other hand, it is also often appropriate to cover each aspect separately; see for example Southwest, Western Australia, which disambiguates separate articles for the governmental region, the ecoregion and the drainage division. I guess the choice is up to whoever wants to invest effort in the article. Hesperian 00:55, 12 July 2005 (UTC)

• • Ok, thanks for that. What is the wiki method for standardising information on a page? I can see that if we have a number of articles on suburbs that also double as an article about the Shire they are in, it might be nice to have them with all the same formatting and information. Or is that also something usually left to the individual authors? SweenyTod 01:20, 12 July 2005 (UTC)

Followup on 'Suburbs of Perth' and 'Suburbs of Mundaring' categories

Having had the Mundaring Suburbs (strictly they are actually localities in Mundaring) category created - there is now the problem that some localities in Mundaring are actually outside of the Metropolitan Area as is recognised by the state government, so they a really localities -not suburbs! Also, the placing of perth-stub against perth suburbs that are correctly inside the metro area - there appear to be no other suburbs in other local govt areas in perth with perth stubs - so are they correct or not? User:SatuSuro 14:24, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

Also Mundaring council has just erected signs at the edge of each area with a sign "Locality of Mundaring" User:SatuSuro 04:29, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

I think "locality" was always the formal name (there's a sign in suburban Gwelup to that effect too) - although the Gazetteer recognises a difference between LOCB and SUB. Orderinchaos 07:11, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Following edits

This article is worse than it was year ago - it needs a major re-write - status needs lowering SatuSuro 03:16, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mundaring, Western Australia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080719022351/http://www.swanmagazine.com.au/Pages/DefPages/aboutus.htm to http://www.swanmagazine.com.au/Pages/DefPages/aboutus.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080810081531/http://www.ga.gov.au/bin/gazd01?rec=304517 to http://www.ga.gov.au/bin/gazd01?rec=304517

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:40, 8 February 2018 (UTC)