Talk:Multi-commodity flow problem

Latest comment: 5 years ago by DuncanECameron in topic Applications


Applications

edit

There is a need to add some real applications of multi-commodity flow problem of both the types (fractional flows allowed and not allowed). Amit 06:52, 20 June 2022 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Qx2020 (talkcontribs)


The description of the flow splitting is unclear and uses very similar (although with {0,1} and [0,1] differences in the brackets used) example for fractional (multipath) and whole (singlepath) flows. What is the significance of the different brackets? --DuncanECameron (talk) 08:55, 21 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

I'm pretty sure the constraint   needs to be specified explicitly. Otherwise one can easily find a solution satisfying the three constraints, unless of course the first (capacity constraint) and third (demand constraint) conflict, in which case there is clearly no solution. At a casual glance it seems that the second constraint takes care of this, but it doesn't. 220.227.184.145 08:18, 18 July 2007 (UTC)ParakramReply

In the section "Software solving the problem: http://www.zib.de/Optimization/Software/Mcf/" seems to be wrong. I've read the documentation and it only states that it's an implementation of the network simplex and . MCF does not stand for "multi commodity flow" but for "minimal cost flow" in that case. On the other hand, http://www-eio.upc.es/~jcastro/pprn.html states to solve multi commodity flows. --Xor2k (talk) 15:45, 14 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

"Papers by Clifford Stein about this problem: http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~cliff/papers/#mcf" is broken, 404. --Xor2k (talk) 15:45, 14 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

The "maximum multi-commodity flow problem" is explained as maximizing this sum:

 

But constraint 3 shows that:

 

So there is no point on maximizing it. There must be something wrong, im not an expert though. --vingarcia (talk) 21:41, 03 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Multi-commodity flow problem. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:53, 8 February 2018 (UTC)Reply