 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Village Description
editThere seems to be some confusion over the size and description of the village and particularly it's harbour. Mullion has a small harbour, capable of sheltering a handful of small fishing boats (not trawlers) at the most. Currently there are about six small boats kept at the harbour. The harbour is nearly dry at low tide, and is not large or deep enough to receive ships at any state of the tide (therefore it is not classed as a 'port'). Mullion harbour is not, nor has it at any point in it's life been a cargo port! The harbour was built to shelter the local fishing boats, and is now owned by the National Trust.
As for the settlement itself, it has a parish (not town) council, does not have a mayor, no town hall, no market charter and no industry. Even ignoring those definitions, I don't think that anyone who has been to Mullion would be able to confuse it with a town!
Of course other people may disagree with me, in which case I'd be interested in seeing any further debate about it...
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Mullion, Cornwall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070228073416/http://www.catholic-forum.com:80/saintS/saintm0w.htm to http://www.catholic-forum.com/saints/saintm0w.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:31, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
 | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Due to 8 or 9 vandal edits and only 2 reversion, I am asking for WP:SEMI to prevent this from happening. An article can't be improved if WP:RCP people like me have to spend a lot of time reverting and warning VANDALS. As I wait reply, I will go trot over to some Talk pages and issues warnings for bad behavior. maybe go full WP:AIV on a couple if they have a bad rap sheet.L3X1 (talk) 22:10, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Not done: requests for increases to the page protection level should be made at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. - Mlpearc (open channel) 22:14, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for reminding me, done. L3X1 (talk) 22:24, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
